UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
Or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-16753
AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 06-1500476 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
12400 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100 San Diego, California |
92130 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (866) 871-8519
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of November 1, 2012, there were 44,386,650 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Item 1. | Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited and in thousands, except par value)
September 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,823 | $ | 3,962 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $5,323 and $4,761 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
141,881 | 146,654 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, subcontractor |
19,686 | 22,497 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
7,755 | 5,691 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
2,323 | 3,372 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
11,685 | 19,335 | ||||||
Other current assets |
6,497 | 3,652 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
0 | 7,310 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
193,650 | 212,473 | ||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments |
18,917 | 18,244 | ||||||
Fixed assets, net |
14,968 | 16,863 | ||||||
Deposits and other assets |
19,225 | 19,329 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
2,166 | 1,823 | ||||||
Goodwill |
123,324 | 123,324 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
138,523 | 143,575 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 510,773 | $ | 535,631 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Bank overdraft |
$ | 3,531 | $ | 3,515 | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
43,564 | 49,809 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
49,246 | 43,649 | ||||||
Revolving credit facility |
0 | 3,000 | ||||||
Current portion of notes payable |
12,000 | 28,125 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,507 | 2,155 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
5,698 | 8,313 | ||||||
Liabilities related to assets held for sale |
0 | 1,486 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
115,546 | 140,052 | ||||||
Notes payable, less current portion and discount |
157,996 | 174,198 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
64,026 | 61,646 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
337,568 | 375,896 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series A Conditional Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value; 6,000 shares authorized; 4,473 and 4,758 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
22,631 | 24,076 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 4,000 shares authorized; none outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000 shares authorized; 41,122 and 40,454 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
411 | 405 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
399,879 | 394,958 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(249,278 | ) | (259,331 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(438 | ) | (373 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
150,574 | 135,659 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 510,773 | $ | 535,631 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited and in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 243,912 | $ | 229,006 | $ | 706,110 | $ | 665,413 | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
174,329 | 165,345 | 506,340 | 478,879 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
69,583 | 63,661 | 199,770 | 186,534 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
52,375 | 49,477 | 149,855 | 146,385 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,435 | 3,921 | 10,682 | 12,479 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
55,810 | 53,398 | 160,537 | 158,864 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from operations |
13,773 | 10,263 | 39,233 | 27,670 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net (including loss on debt extinguishment of $9,815 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012) |
3,688 | 7,017 | 22,811 | 18,107 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
10,085 | 3,246 | 16,422 | 9,563 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
4,227 | 2,242 | 7,192 | 6,231 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
5,858 | 1,004 | 9,230 | 3,332 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
0 | (27,903 | ) | 823 | (27,162 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 5,858 | $ | (26,899 | ) | $ | 10,053 | $ | (23,830 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic income (loss) per common share from: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.00 | (0.69 | ) | 0.02 | (0.68 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.13 | $ | (0.67 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted income (loss) per common share from: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.00 | (0.61 | ) | 0.02 | (0.59 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.12 | $ | (0.59 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.52 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
40,850 | 40,327 | 40,747 | 39,736 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
46,897 | 45,950 | 46,512 | 45,924 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
(55 | ) | 33 | (65 | ) | 30 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 5,803 | $ | (26,866 | ) | $ | 9,988 | $ | (23,800 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
(Unaudited and in thousands)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
40,454 | $ | 405 | $ | 394,958 | $ | (259,331 | ) | $ | (373 | ) | $ | 135,659 | |||||||||||
Preferred stock conversion |
285 | 2 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1,444 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock appreciation rights (SARs) exercised and restricted stock units (RSUs) vested and issued |
383 | 4 | (876 | ) | 0 | 0 | (872 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax shortfall from SARs exercised and RSUs vested and issued |
0 | 0 | (223 | ) | 0 | 0 | (223 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
0 | 0 | 4,578 | 0 | 0 | 4,578 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 10,053 | (65 | ) | 9,988 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2012 |
41,122 | $ | 411 | $ | 399,879 | $ | (249,278 | ) | $ | (438 | ) | $ | 150,574 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited and in thousands)
Nine Months
Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 10,053 | $ | (23,830 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10,682 | 12,538 | ||||||
Non-cash interest expense |
2,346 | 2,829 | ||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment |
9,815 | 0 | ||||||
Increase in allowances for doubtful accounts and sales credits |
5,302 | 2,964 | ||||||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
4,447 | (695 | ) | |||||
Stock-based compensation |
4,578 | 5,409 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from SARs exercised and RSUs vested and issued |
(12 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Impairment charges |
0 | 31,198 | ||||||
Loss on disposal or sale of fixed assets |
16 | 100 | ||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
(1,187 | ) | 0 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from divestiture: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(529 | ) | (19,438 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable, subcontractor |
2,811 | (359 | ) | |||||
Income taxes receivable |
1,049 | 1,550 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(3,905 | ) | (380 | ) | ||||
Deposits and other assets |
(2,104 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(6,222 | ) | 1,003 | |||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
5,597 | 5,440 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
(675 | ) | (5,290 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
42,062 | 12,799 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase and development of fixed assets |
(3,753 | ) | (3,550 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of assets held for sale |
8,644 | 0 | ||||||
Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments balance |
(673 | ) | 2,711 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
4,218 | (839 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Capital lease repayments |
(492 | ) | (503 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from revolving credit facility |
0 | 14,600 | ||||||
Payments on revolving credit facility |
(3,000 | ) | (11,600 | ) | ||||
Repayments of prior notes payable |
(206,500 | ) | (9,250 | ) | ||||
Payments on new term loan credit facility |
(28,380 | ) | 0 | |||||
Proceeds from new term loan credit facility, net of discount |
198,000 | 0 | ||||||
Payment of financing costs |
(3,938 | ) | (855 | ) | ||||
Prepayment penalty associated with the prior credit facilities |
(1,200 | ) | 0 | |||||
Payments of employee tax withholdings from equity transactions |
(872 | ) | (2,046 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefit from SARs exercised and RSUs vested and issued |
12 | 108 | ||||||
Change in bank overdraft |
16 | 316 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(46,354 | ) | (9,230 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(65 | ) | 30 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(139 | ) | 2,760 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
3,962 | 1,883 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 3,823 | $ | 4,643 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest (net of $27 and $58 capitalized during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively) |
$ | 10,992 | $ | 15,511 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
$ | 363 | $ | 1,506 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated balance sheets and related condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders equity and cash flows contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this Quarterly Report), which are unaudited, include the accounts of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all entries necessary for a fair presentation of such unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been included. These entries consisted only of normal recurring items. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for the entire fiscal year or for any future period.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Please refer to the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 9, 2012.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to asset impairments, accruals for self-insurance, compensation and related benefits, accounts receivable, contingencies and litigation, valuation and recognition of share-based payments and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting update that gives companies the option to make a qualitative evaluation about the likelihood of goodwill impairment. The Company will be required to perform the two-step impairment test only if the Company concludes that, after performing a qualitative assessment, the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than its carrying value. The accounting update is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2012 and such adoption did not have a material effect on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. The guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in stockholders equity, which was the Companys presentation. This guidance requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company adopted this guidance beginning January 1, 2012, and has selected to present interim other comprehensive income (loss) in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income (loss).
2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On January 30, 2012, the Company completed the sale of its home healthcare services segment to BAYADA Home Health Care, Inc. for a total of $9,650, of which $1,006 was held in escrow as of September 30, 2012.
The following table presents the revenues and the components of discontinued operations, net of tax:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 0 | $ | 13,293 | $ | 3,885 | $ | 40,825 | ||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes |
0 | (30,544 | ) | (547 | ) | (29,268 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax benefit |
0 | 2,641 | 183 | 2,106 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
0 | (27,903 | ) | (364 | ) | (27,162 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, before income taxes |
0 | 0 | 3,825 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
0 | 0 | (2,638 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
0 | 0 | 1,187 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total income (loss) from discontinued operations |
$ | 0 | $ | (27,903 | ) | $ | 823 | $ | (27,162 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue consists of fees earned primarily from the permanent and temporary placement of healthcare professionals. Revenue is recognized when earned and realizable. The Company has entered into certain contracts with healthcare organizations to provide managed services programs. Under these contract arrangements, the Company uses its temporary healthcare professionals along with those of third party subcontractors to fulfill customer orders. If the Company uses subcontractors, it records revenue net of related subcontractors expense. The resulting net revenue represents the administrative fee the Company charges for its vendor management services. The Company records subcontractor accounts receivable from the customer in the consolidated balance sheet. The Company generally pays the subcontractor after it has received payment from the customer. Payables to subcontractors of $18,599 were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2012. Payables to subcontractors of $24,268 were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011.
4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company measures stock-based compensation cost at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and recognizes it as expense over the requisite service period.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company granted 392 RSUs with a weighted average grant date fair value of approximately $5.99 per RSU. In addition to the regular RSUs, the Company also granted 465 performance restricted stock units (PRSUs), which contain a market condition, with the ultimate realizable number of PRSUs dependent on relative and absolute total shareholder return over a three-year period, up to a maximum amount to be issued under the award of 175% of the original grant, or 814 PRSUs. The fair values of PRSUs granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were estimated at $8.15 per PRSU using the Monte-Carlo simulation valuation model. The Company recorded $1,020 in stock-based compensation expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 related to equity awards granted during the period.
As of September 30, 2012, there was $221 of pre-tax total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options and SARs, which will be adjusted for future changes in forfeitures. The Company expects to recognize such cost over a weighted average remaining period of 0.5 years. As of September 30, 2012, there was $6,696 of pre-tax total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs and PRSUs, which will be adjusted for future changes in forfeitures. The Company expects to recognize such cost over a period of 1.9 years.
5. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Securities that are entitled to participate in dividends with common stock, such as the Companys Series A Conditional Convertible Preferred Stock (the Preferred Stock), are considered to be participating securities and the two-class method is used for purposes of calculating basic net income per share. Under the two-class method, a portion of net income is allocated to these participating securities and excluded from the calculation of basic net income per common share. Diluted net income per common share reflects the effects of potentially dilutive stock-based equity instruments and common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock.
Stock-based awards to purchase 1,964 and 2,164 shares of common stock for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per common share because the effect of these instruments was anti-dilutive.
Stock-based awards to purchase 2,136 and 2,146 shares of common stock for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per common share because the effect of these instruments was anti-dilutive.
8
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 5,858 | $ | 1,004 | $ | 9,230 | $ | 3,332 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
0 | (27,903 | ) | 823 | (27,162 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 5,858 | $ | (26,899 | ) | $ | 10,053 | $ | (23,830 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Less: Allocation to participating securitiesfrom continuing operations |
(575 | ) | (107 | ) | (905 | ) | (356 | ) | ||||||||
Allocation to participating securitiesfrom discontinued operations |
0 | 0 | (81 | ) | 0 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total allocation to participating securities |
(575 | ) | (107 | ) | (986 | ) | (356 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholdersbasic |
5,283 | (27,006 | ) | 9,067 | (24,186 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic income (loss) per common share from: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.00 | (0.69 | ) | 0.02 | (0.68 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.13 | $ | (0.67 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted income (loss) per common share from: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
0.00 | (0.61 | ) | 0.02 | (0.59 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 0.12 | $ | (0.59 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.52 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic |
40,850 | 40,327 | 40,747 | 39,736 | ||||||||||||
Plus dilutive effect of potential common shares |
6,047 | 5,623 | 5,765 | 6,188 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstandingdiluted |
46,897 | 45,950 | 46,512 | 45,924 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. SEGMENT INFORMATION
In 2010 and 2011, the Company had four reportable segments: nurse and allied healthcare staffing, locum tenens staffing, physician permanent placement services and home healthcare services. In January 2012, the Company divested its home healthcare services segment. As a result, the Company has classified the home healthcare services segments results of operations as discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
The Companys management relies on internal management reporting processes that provide revenue and segment operating income for making financial decisions and allocating resources. Segment operating income represents income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax, plus interest expense (net of interest income), stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, and unallocated corporate overhead. The Companys management does not evaluate, manage or measure performance of segments using asset information; accordingly, asset information by segment is not prepared or disclosed.
The following table provides a reconciliation of revenue and segment operating income by reportable segment to consolidated results and was derived from the segments internal financial information as used for corporate management purposes:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing |
$ | 166,331 | $ | 147,738 | $ | 478,832 | $ | 422,541 | ||||||||
Locum tenens staffing |
67,591 | 72,080 | 198,692 | 213,367 | ||||||||||||
Physician permanent placement services |
9,990 | 9,188 | 28,586 | 29,505 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 243,912 | $ | 229,006 | $ | 706,110 | $ | 665,413 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Segment operating income |
||||||||||||||||
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing |
$ | 18,785 | $ | 15,197 | $ | 54,306 | $ | 44,736 | ||||||||
Locum tenens staffing |
6,298 | 6,283 | 16,805 | 17,759 | ||||||||||||
Physician permanent placement services |
2,201 | 2,142 | 5,797 | 8,470 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
27,284 | 23,622 | 76,908 | 70,965 | |||||||||||||
Unallocated corporate overhead |
8,507 | 7,750 | 22,418 | 25,432 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,435 | 3,921 | 10,682 | 12,479 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,569 | 1,688 | 4,575 | 5,384 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net (including loss on debt extinguishment of $9,815 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012) |
3,688 | 7,017 | 22,811 | 18,107 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income tax |
$ | 10,085 | $ | 3,246 | $ | 16,422 | $ | 9,563 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The authoritative guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activities and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Financial assets and liabilities
The Company utilizes the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included restricted cash equivalents and investments, including investments associated with the Companys deferred compensation plan. The Companys restricted cash equivalents and investments typically consist of U.S. Treasury securities and the fair value is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Companys investments associated with its deferred compensation plan typically consist of publicly traded money market funds and mutual funds for which market prices are readily available.
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements as of September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | 18,604 | $ | 18,604 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Trading securities investment |
195 | 195 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financial assets measured at fair value |
$ | 18,799 | $ | 18,799 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Quoted Prices
in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant
Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | 18,015 | $ | 18,015 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
Trading securities investment |
52 | 52 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financial assets measured at fair value |
$ | 18,067 | $ | 18,067 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-financial assets and liabilities
The Company applies fair value techniques on a non-recurring basis associated with valuing potential impairment losses related to goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets accounted for pursuant to accounting guidance on goodwill and other intangible assets.
The Company evaluates goodwill at the reporting unit level and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment and whenever circumstances occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units based on a combination of inputs including the market capitalization of the Company as well as Level 3 inputs such as discounted cash flows that are not observable from the market, directly or indirectly. The Company determined the fair value of its indefinite-lived intangible assets using the income approach (relief-from-royalty method), based on Level 3 inputs. There were no fair value measurements of non-financial assets and liabilities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Quoted Prices
in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant
Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total Losses for Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 123,324 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 123,324 | $ | 24,498 | ||||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
$ | 83,200 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 83,200 | $ | 14,400 | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ | 38,898 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
8. INCOME TAXES
The Company recorded an income tax expense of $7,192 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from continuing operations as compared to a tax expense of $6,231 for the same period in 2011. The Company currently estimates its annual effective income tax rate from continuing operations to be approximately 43.1% (expense) for 2012, as compared to the 64.0% effective income tax rate in 2011. The difference in effective tax rates for 2011 and the forecasted rate for 2012 is primarily due to the relationship of pre-tax income to permanent differences.
The estimated annual effective tax rate for 2012 is greater than the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the following:
Federal statutory rate benefit |
35.0 | % | ||
State tax expense, net of federal benefit |
4.7 | |||
Rate impact from provisions for uncertain tax positions |
5.1 | |||
Other, net |
(1.7 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Estimated annual effective income tax rate |
43.1 | % | ||
|
|
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities (including the impact of available carryback and carryforward periods), projected future taxable income, and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of current and historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
11
9. NOTES PAYABLE AND RELATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
On April 5, 2012, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the New Credit Agreement) with several lenders to provide for two credit facilities (the Credit Facilities), including (A) a $50,000 secured revolving credit facility (the Revolver) that includes a $20,000 sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit and a $15,000 sublimit for swingline loans and (B) a $200,000 face value secured term loan credit facility (the Term Loan), net of unamortized original issue discount of $2,000. In addition, the New Credit Agreement provides that the Company may from time to time obtain an increase in the Revolver or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $75,000 (with a $37,500 sublimit for the Revolver) subject to, among other conditions, the arrangement of additional commitments with financial institutions reasonably acceptable to the Company and the administrative agent.
The Revolver carries an unused fee of 0.5% per annum. There are no mandatory reductions in the Revolver. Borrowings under the Revolver bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR or a base rate option selected by the Company, plus a spread of 3.75% to 4.25% and 2.75% to 3.25%, respectively, in each case, as specifically determined quarterly based upon the Companys then-existing consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the New Credit Agreement). The Term Loan is subject to amortization of principal of 1.00% per year of the original Term Loan amount, payable in equal quarterly installments. Borrowings under the Term Loan bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR (with a floor of 1.25%) or a base rate option selected by the Company, plus a spread of 4.50% to 4.75% and 3.50% to 3.75%, respectively, in each case, as specifically determined quarterly based upon the Companys then-existing consolidated leverage ratio. At September 30, 2012, the Company had $169,996 net of discount, outstanding under the Term Loan at a 6.0% interest rate.
The proceeds from the initial drawdown under the Credit Facilities were used to repay in full all outstanding indebtedness under two prior credit agreements to which the Company was a party and to pay related transaction costs. The Revolver is available for working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and general corporate purposes of the Company. The maturity dates of the Revolver and the Term Loan are April 5, 2017 and April 5, 2018, respectively. At September 30, 2012, there was $38,720 of available credit under the Revolver.
In connection with obtaining the Credit Facilities, the Company incurred $3,938 in deferred financing fees, which were capitalized and are amortized to interest expense over the term of the New Credit Agreement. In addition, the Companys loss on debt extinguishment, before tax, included the write-off to interest expense of $8,615 of unamortized deferred financing fees and original issue discount and a $1,200 prepayment penalty associated with the repayment of the prior credit facilities.
During the second and third quarters of 2012, the Company made a quarterly principal amortization payment and voluntary prepayments on the Term Loan totaling $28,380. The $12,000 current portion of the notes payable set forth in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet dated September 30, 2012 represents voluntary prepayments the Company made subsequent to September 30, 2012 through the time of filing of this Quarterly Report with the SEC. The voluntary prepayments the Company has made also satisfied all scheduled quarterly principal amortization payments due under the Credit Facilities through the term of the New Credit Agreement.
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: LEGAL
Staff Care, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was the subject of an assessment by the California Employment Development Department (EDD) with respect to the payment of certain payroll related taxes, in connection with locum tenens and allied providers, for the period between April 1, 2001 and June 30, 2007. Staff Care appealed the EDDs assessment, but on September 5, 2008 the Company made a payment to the EDD in the amount of $2,295 to cease the accrual of interest while the appeal was pending. On March 28, 2012, Staff Care, Inc. and the EDD entered into a settlement agreement, which resolved all assessments and claims regarding the subject matter of the appeal from April 1, 2001 through June 30, 2007. In connection with the settlement, the EDD refunded to Staff Care $2,012 of the $2,295 payment made by the Company on September 5, 2008. As a result, the Company recorded a $2,012 benefit offsetting selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
11. PREFERRED STOCK
On September 1, 2010, in connection with the NF Investors, Inc. (NFI) acquisition, the Company issued 5,660 shares of Preferred Stock, including shares deposited in escrow to satisfy any indemnification claims by AMN with respect to breaches of representations, warranties and covenants by NFI. On December 20, 2010, 52 shares of Preferred Stock were released from escrow to the Company, and 221 shares of Preferred Stock were released from escrow to the former NFI stockholders, under the terms of the acquisition of NFI. During the fourth quarter of 2011, 7 shares of Preferred Stock were released from escrow to the Company and during the third quarter of 2012, 990 shares of Preferred Stock were released from escrow to the former NFI stockholders, in each case under the terms of the acquisition of NFI. At September 30, 2012, 457 shares of Preferred Stock remained in escrow for potential indemnification claims. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, 4,473 and 4,758 shares of Preferred Stock were outstanding, respectively.
12
The Preferred Stock is entitled to receive dividends consistent with dividends payable on the Companys common stock. In addition, each share of the Preferred Stock (i) is convertible into one share of the Companys common stock (subject to customary adjustments for accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, and changes in the Companys capital structure) at the option of the holder and (ii) will automatically convert into one share of common stock (subject to customary adjustments for accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, and changes in the Companys capital structure) upon the earlier of (A) the closing price of the Companys common stock being equal to or greater than $10.00 per share (as adjusted from time to time to fully reflect changes in the Companys capital structure) for a period of 30 consecutive trading days after December 15, 2010 and (B) September 1, 2020. From October 1, 2012 through October 31, 2012, approximately 3,258 shares of Preferred Stock were converted into the Companys common stock. As of November 1, 2012, 1,215 shares of Preferred Stock were outstanding.
13
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 9, 2012 (2011 Annual Report). Certain statements in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements. See Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements. We undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report. References in this Quarterly Report to AMN Healthcare, the Company, we, us and our refer to AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
Overview
We are healthcares workforce innovator, providing a broad spectrum of workforce solutions and staffing services to the nations healthcare facilities. As an innovative workforce solutions partner, our managed services programs, recruitment process outsourcing, consulting services, and placement of physicians, nurses and allied healthcare professionals into temporary and permanent positions enable clients to successfully reduce complexity, increase efficiency and improve patient outcomes within the continually evolving healthcare environment. Our clients include acute and sub-acute care hospitals, government facilities, community health centers and clinics, physician practice groups, and several other healthcare-related settings. Our clients utilize our workforce solutions and our healthcare staffing services to cost-effectively manage their clinical workforce needs, both temporary and permanent.
We conduct business through three reportable segments: nurse and allied healthcare staffing, locum tenens staffing and physician permanent placement services.
For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded revenue of $243.9 million, as compared to revenue of $229.0 million for the same period last year. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded net income of $5.9 million, as compared to a net loss of $26.9 million, which included pre-tax impairment charges of $31.2 million reported in the loss from discontinued operations, for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded revenue of $706.1 million, as compared to revenue of $665.4 million for the same period last year. We recorded net income of $10.1 million, which included a pre-tax $9.8 million loss on debt extinguishment charged to interest expense associated with the refinancing of our prior credit facilities, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to a net loss of $23.8 million, which included pre-tax impairment charges of $31.2 million reported in the loss from discontinued operations, for the same period last year.
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment revenue comprised 68% and 64% of total consolidated revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Through our nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment, we provide hospital and other healthcare facilities with a range of clinical and workforce staffing solutions, including: (1) a comprehensive managed services solution in which we manage all of the temporary nursing and allied needs of a client; (2) traditional clinical staffing solutions of variable assignment lengths; and (3) a recruitment process outsourcing program that leverages our expertise and support systems to replace or complement a clients existing internal recruitment function for permanent placement needs.
Locum tenens staffing segment revenue comprised 28% and 32% of total consolidated revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Through our locum tenens staffing segment, we place physicians of all specialties, as well as dentists, certified registered nurse anesthetists, physician assistants and nurse practitioners with clients on a temporary basis as independent contractors. These locum tenens physicians and other professionals are used by our healthcare facility and physician practice group clients to fill temporary vacancies created by vacation and leave schedules and to bridge the gap while they seek permanent candidates or explore expansion. Our locum tenens clients represent a diverse group of healthcare organizations throughout the United States, including hospitals, medical groups, occupational medical clinics, individual practitioners, networks, psychiatric facilities, government institutions and managed care entities. The professionals we place are recruited nationwide and are typically placed on multi-week contracts with assignment lengths ranging from a few days up to one year.
Physician permanent placement services segment revenue comprised 4% of total consolidated revenue for both the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Through our physician permanent placement services segment, we assist hospitals and physician practice groups throughout the United States in identifying and recruiting physicians for permanent placement. We perform the vast majority of our services on a retained basis under our Merritt Hawkins brand, for which we are generally paid through a blend of retained hourly, sourcing and placement fees. To a smaller degree, we also perform our services on a contingent basis, exclusively under our Kendall & Davis brand, for which fees are paid once physician candidates are ultimately hired by our clients. Our broad specialty offerings include over 70 specialist and sub-specialist opportunities such as internal medicine, family practice and orthopedic surgery.
14
In January 2012, we completed the sale of our home healthcare services segment. Accordingly, its results of operations are recorded as discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Management Initiatives
Our growth strategy focuses on providing an innovative and differentiated value and experience to our clients, clinicians and physicians. To accomplish this, we have broadened our service offerings beyond our traditional travel nurse and allied temporary staffing, locum tenens staffing, and physician permanent placement services, to include more strategic and recurring revenue sources from innovative clinical workforce solutions offerings such as managed services programs and recruitment process outsourcing. Through these differentiated services, we have built strategic relationships with our clients to assist them in improving their financial, operational and patient care results through productivity and candidate quality enhancements. We continually seek strategic opportunities to expand into complementary service offerings that leverage our core capabilities of recruiting and credentialing clinicians and physicians, while providing a more recurring stream of revenues that reduces our exposure to economic cycle risk. At the same time, we continue to invest in our innovative workforce solutions, new candidate recruitment initiatives and technology infrastructure to ensure we are strategically ready in the long term to capitalize on the demand growth anticipated from the significant healthcare workforce shortages due to healthcare reform and the aging population.
Recent Trends
Demand has rebounded in the travel nurse business from its low point in 2009, but still remains well below levels experienced in 2007 through 2008. Demand has been particularly strong for specialty nurses for which there is limited supply. While our demand is spread across a broad base of clients, we continue to see more of our clients migrate to managed services program relationships, and during 2012 revenue from these contracts represent approximately one-third of our nurse and allied healthcare staffing business, a substantial increase from 1% in 2008. As a result of these managed service relationships, we have an improved ability to fill more of the demand and create operational efficiencies.
Within the allied staffing business, demand has been strong in our therapy business throughout 2012. As we enter the fourth quarter, however, we are experiencing a reduction in demand from a portion of our therapy clients due to Medicare Part B reimbursement changes. These changes impact a small portion of our therapy business. In our locum tenens staffing segment, we are seeing strong market demand in our primary care, emergency medicine and hospitalist specialties, but continue to experience weaker demand in the anesthesia and radiology specialties, which historically represented two of our largest specialties in this segment. As a result of market demand and operational changes, we are experiencing improving margins due primarily to more favorable bill rates and improved bill to pay spreads.
Throughout 2012, we have seen increased demand for our services within our physician permanent placement services segment. We have also seen an increase in our recruiter productivity completing those searches which has translated into revenue growth.
Critical Accounting Principles and Estimates
Our critical accounting principles and estimates remain consistent with those reported in our 2011 Annual Report.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of our revenue:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
71.5 | 72.2 | 71.7 | 72.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
28.5 | 27.8 | 28.3 | 28.0 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
21.5 | 21.6 | 21.2 | 22.0 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.4 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from operations |
5.6 | 4.5 | 5.6 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
1.5 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
4.1 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
2.4 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
0.0 | (12.2 | ) | 0.1 | (4.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
2.4 | % | (11.8 | )% | 1.4 | % | (3.6 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Comparison of Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
Revenue. Revenue increased 7% to $243.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $229.0 million for the same period in 2011, primarily due to higher revenue in the nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment, partially offset by lower revenue in the locum tenens staffing segment.
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment revenue increased 13% to $166.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $147.7 million for the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment during the three months ended September 30, 2012.
Locum tenens staffing segment revenue decreased 6% to $67.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $72.1 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decline in the number of days filled by healthcare professionals and an increasing percentage of our days filled being attributable to lower bill rate specialties, partially offset by an increase in the average bill rate across most specialties.
Physician permanent placement services segment revenue increased 9% to $10.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $9.2 million for the same period in 2011.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue increased 5% to $174.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $165.3 million for the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment in the nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment.
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment cost of revenue increased 13% to $122.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $108.4 million for the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to the increase in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment during the three months ended September 30, 2012.
Locum tenens staffing segment cost of revenue decreased 9% to $48.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $53.3 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decline in the number of days filled by healthcare professionals and an increasing percentage of our days filled being attributable to the lower pay rate specialties.
Physician permanent placement services segment cost of revenue remained flat at $3.6 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 9% to $69.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $63.7 million for the same period in 2011, representing gross margins of 28.5% and 27.8%, respectively. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to an increase in gross margin in the locum tenens staffing segment due to higher bill to pay spreads and a higher gross margin in the physician permanent placement segment due to a shift in revenue mix to higher margin hourly billings and placements combined with lower direct sourcing costs. Gross margin by reportable segment for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 26.5% and 26.6% for nurse and allied healthcare staffing, 28.4% and 26.0% for locum tenens staffing and 64.1% and 60.5% for physician permanent placement services, respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $52.4 million, representing 21.5% of revenue, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to $49.5 million, representing 21.6% of revenue, for the same period in 2011. The increase in SG&A expenses compared to the same quarter last year was due primarily to increased spending supporting the growth in business, partially offset by the improved SG&A leverage. SG&A expenses broken down among the reportable segments, unallocated corporate overhead and stock-based compensation are as follows ($ amount in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing |
$ | 25,212 | $ | 24,152 | ||||
Locum tenens staffing |
12,890 | 12,471 | ||||||
Physician permanent placement services |
4,197 | 3,416 | ||||||
Unallocated corporate overhead |
8,507 | 7,750 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,569 | 1,688 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 52,375 | $ | 49,477 | |||||
|
|
|
|
16
Depreciation and Amortization. Amortization expense decreased 11% to $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $1.8 million for the same period in 2011. Depreciation expense decreased 14% to $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $2.1 million for the same period in 2011, with the decrease primarily attributable to having more fixed assets fully depreciated during the three months ended September 30, 2012.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net, was $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $7.0 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to the lower interest rate in connection with the refinancing of our credit facilities as well as the lower average outstanding debt balance. The interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 included $1.1 million of costs incurred in connection with the amendments to the then-existing credit facilities.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense from continuing operations was $4.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to income tax expense from continuing operations of $2.2 million for the same period in 2011, reflecting effective income tax rates of 41.9% and 69.1% for these periods, respectively. The decrease in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to the relationship of pre-tax income to permanent differences and the impact of provisions for uncertain tax positions. See additional information in Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 8, Income Taxes.
Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations. We did not have any income (loss) from discontinued operations during the three months ended September 30, 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we began the process to divest our home healthcare services segment and completed the sale in January 2012. We classified the home healthcare services segment as assets and liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2011, and its results of operations as discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2011. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the loss from discontinued operations of $27.9 million included $24.5 million related to goodwill impairment and $6.7 million related to tradename impairment along with the results of the operations of the home healthcare segment during the year. See additional information in Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 2, Discontinued Operations.
Comparison of Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Revenue. Revenue increased 6% to $706.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $665.4 million for the same period in 2011, primarily due to higher revenue in the nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment, partially offset by lower revenue in the locum tenens staffing and physician permanent placement services segments.
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment revenue increased 13% to $478.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $422.5 million for the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment and an increase in bill rates during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Locum tenens staffing segment revenue decreased 7% to $198.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $213.4 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decline in the number of days filled by healthcare professionals and an increasing percentage of our days filled being attributable to lower bill rate specialties.
Physician permanent placement services segment revenue decreased slightly to $28.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $29.5 million for the same period in 2011.
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue increased 6% to $506.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $478.9 million for the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment in the nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment.
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing segment cost of revenue increased 13% to $351.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $310.0 million for the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to the increase in the average number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and a $1.6 million actuarial-based workers compensation benefit recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Locum tenens staffing segment cost of revenue decreased 9% to $143.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $158.1 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decline in the number of days filled by healthcare professionals and an increasing percentage of our days filled being attributable to the lower pay rate specialties.
17
Physician permanent placement services segment cost of revenue increased 3% to $11.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $10.8 million for the same period in 2011 primarily due to increases in travel expenses and recruiter compensation.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 7% to $199.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $186.5 million for the same period in 2011, representing gross margins of 28.3% and 28.0%, respectively. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to an increase in gross margin in the locum tenens staffing segment due to higher bill to pay spreads. Gross margin by reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was 26.5% and 26.6% for nurse and allied healthcare staffing, 27.8% and 25.9% for locum tenens staffing, and 61.2% and 63.4% for physician permanent placement services, respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative. SG&A expenses were $149.9 million, representing 21.2% of revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to $146.4 million, representing 22.0% of revenue, for the same period in 2011. The slight increase in SG&A expenses compared to the same period last year was due primarily to increased spending supporting the growth in business, partially offset by the absence of integration-related expenses associated with the Medfinders acquisition, improved SG&A leverage, and a refund received during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 in connection with the settlement of a prior period assessment from the California Employment Development Department. SG&A expenses broken down among the reportable segments, unallocated corporate overhead and stock-based compensation are as follows ($ amount in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Nurse and allied healthcare staffing |
$ | 72,698 | $ | 67,826 | ||||
Locum tenens staffing |
38,459 | 37,512 | ||||||
Physician permanent placement services |
11,705 | 10,231 | ||||||
Unallocated corporate overhead |
22,418 | 25,432 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
4,575 | 5,384 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 149,855 | $ | 146,385 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization. Amortization expense decreased 6% to $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $5.4 million for the same period in 2011. Depreciation expense decreased 21% to $5.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $7.1 million for the same period in 2011, with the decrease primarily attributable to more fixed assets being fully depreciated during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net, was $22.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $18.1 million for the same period in 2011. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included an $8.6 million write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees and original issue discount and a $1.2 million prepayment penalty paid in connection with the refinancing of our credit facilities. The interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 included $1.1 million of costs incurred in connection with the amendments to the then-existing credit facilities.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded income tax expense from continuing operations of $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $6.2 million for the same period in 2011, reflecting effective income tax rates of 43.8% and 65.2% for these periods, respectively. The decrease in the effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to the relationship of pre-tax income to permanent differences and the impact of provisions for uncertain tax positions. See additional information in Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 8, Income Taxes.
Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the income from discontinued operations of $0.8 million included a $1.2 million gain on sale, net of tax. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the loss from discontinued operations of $27.2 million included $24.5 million related to goodwill impairment and $6.7 million related to tradename impairment along with the results of the operations of the home healthcare segment during the year. See additional information in Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 2, Discontinued Operations.
18
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In summary, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, our cash flows were as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 42,062 | $ | 12,799 | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
4,218 | (839 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(46,354 | ) | (9,230 | ) |
Historically, our primary liquidity requirements have been for acquisitions, working capital requirements and debt service under our credit facilities. We have funded these requirements through internally generated cash flow and funds borrowed under our credit facilities. At September 30, 2012, $170.0 million, net of discount, was outstanding under our credit facilities with $38.7 million of available credit under our revolving credit facility.
We believe that cash generated from operations and available borrowings under our existing revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our operations for the next 12 months and beyond. We intend to finance potential future acquisitions either with cash provided from operations, borrowings under our existing revolving credit facility, bank loans, debt or equity offerings, or some combination of the foregoing. The following discussion provides further details of our liquidity and capital resources.
Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $42.1 million, compared to $12.8 million for the same period last year. The increase in net cash provided by operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011 was primarily attributable to better operating results and a decrease in accounts receivable as a result of strong collection efforts. Our Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) was 54 days at September 30, 2012. DSO was 61 days and 55 days at December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011, respectively.
Investing Activities:
Net cash provided by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $4.2 million, compared to $0.8 million net cash used in investing activities for the same period in 2011. The change was primarily related to the proceeds from the sale of the home healthcare services segment during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $46.4 million, primarily due to paying down our current debt and paying off our prior credit facilities offset with the additional borrowings under our new credit facilities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash used in financing activities was $9.2 million primarily due to paying down our then-existing debt.
On April 5, 2012, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the New Credit Agreement). The New Credit Agreement provides two credit facilities (the Credit Facilities), including (A) a $50 million secured revolving credit facility (the Revolver) that includes a $20 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit and a $15 million sublimit for swingline loans and (B) a $200 million face value secured term loan credit facility (the Term Loan), net of unamortized original issue discount of $2.0 million. In addition, the New Credit Agreement provides that we may from time to time obtain an increase in the Revolver or the Term Loan in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $75 million (with a $37.5 million sublimit for the Revolver) subject to, among other conditions, the arrangement of additional commitments with financial institutions reasonably acceptable to us and the administrative agent. The Revolver is available to us for working capital, capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and general corporate purposes. The standby letters of credit issued under one of the previous credit facilities were also rolled under and deemed issued under the Revolver. The maturity dates of the Revolver and the Term Loan are April 5, 2017 and April 5, 2018, respectively.
The proceeds from the initial drawdown under the Credit Facilities were used to repay in full all outstanding indebtedness under our previous credit facilities and to pay related transaction costs. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and prior to our entry into the New Credit Agreement, we made $9.8 million in principal payments on the prior first lien term loan credit facility. In connection with obtaining the Credit Facilities, we incurred approximately $3.9 million in deferred financing fees, which were capitalized and are amortized to interest expense over the term of the New Credit Agreement. In addition, the loss on debt extinguishment, before tax, included the write-off to interest expense of $8.6 million of unamortized deferred financing fees and original issue discount and a $1.2 million prepayment penalty associated with the repayment of the prior credit facilities.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we made a quarterly principal amortization payment and voluntary prepayments on the Term Loan, which totaled $28.4 million. At September 30, 2012, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan (including both the current and long-term portions), net of discount, was $170.0 million. The $12.0 million current portion
19
of the notes payable set forth in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet dated September 30, 2012 represents voluntary prepayments we made subsequent to September 30, 2012 through the time of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the SEC. The voluntary prepayments the Company has made also satisfied all scheduled quarterly principal amortization payments due under the Credit Facilities through the term of the New Credit Agreement.
At September 30, 2012, we maintained outstanding standby letters of credit totaling $29.9 million as collateral in relation to our professional liability insurance agreements, workers compensation insurance agreements, and a corporate office lease agreement. Of the $29.9 million outstanding letters of credit, we have cash collateralized $18.6 million and the Revolver collateralizes the remaining $11.3 million. Outstanding standby letters of credit at December 31, 2011 totaled $28.4 million.
The Revolver carries an unused fee of 0.5% per annum. There are no mandatory reductions in the Revolver. Borrowings under the Revolver bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR or a base rate option selected by us, plus a spread of 3.75% to 4.25% and 2.75% to 3.25%, respectively, in each case, as specifically determined quarterly based upon our then-existing consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the New Credit Agreement). At September 30, 2012, there was no amount outstanding under the Revolver. At December 31, 2011, there was $3.0 million outstanding under our prior revolving facility.
The Term Loan is subject to amortization of principal of 1.00% per year of the original Term Loan amount, payable in equal quarterly installments. Borrowings under the Term Loan bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR (with a floor of 1.25%) or a base rate option selected by us, plus a spread of 4.50% to 4.75% and 3.50% to 3.75%, respectively, in each case, as specifically determined quarterly based upon our then-existing consolidated leverage ratio.
The New Credit Agreement contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants, including restrictions on assumption of additional indebtedness, declaration of dividends, dispositions of assets, consolidation into another entity, capital expenditures in excess of specified amounts and allowable investments. It also contains financial covenants that require us (1) not to exceed a certain maximum consolidated leverage ratio and (2) to maintain a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At September 30, 2012, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Results and Seasonality
Due to the regional and seasonal fluctuations in the hospital patient census and staffing needs of our healthcare facility and other clients and due to the seasonal preferences for destinations of our temporary healthcare professionals, revenue, earnings and the number of temporary healthcare professionals on assignment are subject to moderate seasonal fluctuations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an accounting standard update intended to simplify how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill for impairment by providing entities with an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. This accounting standard update is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, and early adoption is permitted. We are required to adopt this guidance beginning January 1, 2013, and we do not expect the adoption will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We based these forward-looking statements on our expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about future events and about the industry in which we operate. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as believe, anticipate, expect, intend, plan, will, should, would, project, may, variations of such words and other similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of financial items, anticipated growth, future growth and revenues, future economic conditions and performance, plans, objectives and strategies for future operations, expectations, or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those implied by the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are set forth in our 2011 Annual Report and include but are not limited to:
| our ability to sustain and grow our staffing services in a continued significant economic downturn and slow industry; |
| the effects of economic downturns or slow recoveries, which could result in less demand for our services; |
20
| our ability to enter into contracts with hospitals, healthcare facility clients, affiliated healthcare networks and physician practice groups on terms attractive to us and to secure orders and searches related to those contracts; |
| the level of consolidation and concentration of buyers of healthcare staffing services, which could affect the pricing of our services and our ability to mitigate risk; |
| the potential impact on the demand for our services caused by adoption of alternative modes of healthcare delivery; |
| any inability on our part to quickly respond to changing marketplace conditions and customer needs; |
| the ability of our clients to retain and increase the productivity of their permanent staff, which may negatively affect the demand for our services; |
| our ability to grow and operate our business in compliance with employment laws and other legislation, laws and regulations that may directly or indirectly affect us, such as Medicare certification and reimbursement, state licensure, government contracting requirements, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and other state or federal healthcare reform legislation; |
| the challenge to the classification of certain of our healthcare professionals as independent contractors; |
| the effect of medical malpractice and other claims asserted against us for which we carry significant self-insured retentions; |
| any inability on our part to leverage our cost structure effectively; |
| access to and undisrupted performance of our management information and communication systems, including the Internet, our candidate and client databases, and payroll and billing software systems; |
| any inability on our part to keep our client and provider-facing self-service websites operational and without service interruptions; |
| any inability on our part to recruit and retain sufficient quality healthcare professionals at reasonable costs; |
| any inability on our part to properly screen and match quality healthcare professionals with suitable placements; |
| any inability on our part to successfully attract and retain a sufficient number of quality sales and operational personnel; |
| the loss of our key officers and management personnel; |
| any inability on our part to maintain at reasonable costs the positive brand identities we have developed; |
| any recognition by us of an impairment to goodwill or indefinite lived intangibles; |
| the effect of adverse adjustments by us to accruals for self-insured retentions and uncertain income tax liability, which could decrease our earnings or increase our losses, as the case may be, or negatively affect our cash flow; and |
| our level of indebtedness and any inability on our part to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt. |
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, our primary exposure to market risk was interest rate risk associated with our debt instruments. Borrowings under the Term Loan bear interest at floating rates based upon either a LIBOR (with a floor of 1.25%) or a base rate option selected by us, plus a spread of 4.50% to 4.75% and 3.50% to 3.75%, respectively. A 1% change in interest rates on our variable rate debt would have resulted in interest expense fluctuating approximately $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Our international operations create exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risks. We believe that our foreign currency risk is immaterial.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2012 were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
21
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
22
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. |
Description of Document | |
31.1 | Certification by Susan R. Salka pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934* | |
31.2 | Certification by Brian M. Scott pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934* | |
32.1 | Certification by Susan R. Salka pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* | |
32.2 | Certification by Brian M. Scott pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document** | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document** | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document** | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document** | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document** | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document** |
* | Filed herewith. |
** | Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and amend the interactive data files promptly after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. The interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |
23
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 5, 2012
AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. | ||
/S/ SUSAN R. SALKA | ||
Name: |
Susan R. Salka | |
Title: |
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: November 5, 2012
/S/ BRIAN M. SCOTT | ||
Name: |
Brian M. Scott | |
Title: |
Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
24
Exhibit 31.1
Certification Pursuant To
Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, Susan R. Salka, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 5, 2012
/S/ SUSAN R. SALKA | ||
Name: | Susan R. Salka | |
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.2
Certification Pursuant To
Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, Brian M. Scott, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 5, 2012
/S/ BRIAN M. SCOTT | ||
Name: | Brian M. Scott | |
Title: | Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan R. Salka, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: November 5, 2012
/S/ SUSAN R. SALKA |
Susan R. Salka |
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 32.2
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian M. Scott, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: November 5, 2012
/S/ BRIAN M. SCOTT |
Brian M. Scott |
Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |